Social Networks, Environment, and Participation: The Effect of Living Near a Voter on Turnout in Low, Middle, and High Status Neighborhoods
Robert Putnam painted a picture of the American community in the twenty-first century. In his description of the lonely, American bowler, Putnam laments the loss of “social interaction and occasional civic conversation over beer and pizza that solo bowlers forgo” (1995, 70). For Putnam, and so many other scholars, it is these casual conversations that seem quintessential to the democratic process, because these interactions serve to inform, shape, and mobilize individuals. Yet, despite the well-documented decline of membership in civic organizations, there still are places where these daily interactions between friends, neighbors, and family occur. I want to know how the economic composition of a place helps facilitate the development of these social networks, networks which subsequently influence individual behavior? I use a unique dataset that combines both individual and aggregate measures at the Census Tract level. And using a geoprocessing method, I created a variable that measures the social interaction between neighbors. This dataset allows me to test how the affects of social networks differ in neighborhoods of various economic compositions. I find evidence that social networks have the greatest effect on participation in middle status neighborhoods.